<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: can we say frivolous lawsuit in china?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/</link>
	<description>China law blog covering Chinese law, business, and non-profits by Thomas Chow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: baby</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>baby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/26/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Nice website!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice website!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>T Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/26/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/#comment-370</guid>
		<description>I agree that it is all for show.  In the end from a PR perspective, China is the loser, even if they win the lawsuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is all for show.  In the end from a PR perspective, China is the loser, even if they win the lawsuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Vance</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Vance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 04:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/26/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they just kick CNN out of the country? If they did, it wouldn&#039;t be the first time for CNN. But you have to figure that frivolous or not, the government is going to find CNN &#039;guilty.&#039; They love to use this to send a strong message to other media outlets that comments such as Cafferty&#039;s will not be tolerated. It is a big show; and all it&#039;s doing is bringing more attention to CNN

http://www.teachabroadchina.com/category/rrs-rants/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just kick CNN out of the country? If they did, it wouldn&#8217;t be the first time for CNN. But you have to figure that frivolous or not, the government is going to find CNN &#8216;guilty.&#8217; They love to use this to send a strong message to other media outlets that comments such as Cafferty&#8217;s will not be tolerated. It is a big show; and all it&#8217;s doing is bringing more attention to CNN</p>
<p><a href="http://www.teachabroadchina.com/category/rrs-rants/" rel="nofollow">http://www.teachabroadchina.com/category/rrs-rants/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iChinaFeed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can we say frivolous lawsuit in China? (China Esquire)</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/comment-page-1/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator>iChinaFeed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Can we say frivolous lawsuit in China? (China Esquire)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/26/can-we-say-frivolous-lawsuit-in-china/#comment-349</guid>
		<description>[...] on the recent lawsuit brought against CNN at China Esquire: I know that China does not have free speech. But to allow civil liability for editorial comments [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the recent lawsuit brought against CNN at China Esquire: I know that China does not have free speech. But to allow civil liability for editorial comments [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
