<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: environmental protection: enforcement? (part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/</link>
	<description>China law blog covering Chinese law, business, and non-profits by Thomas Chow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: T Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>T Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/01/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Charlie:

I could not agree more.  Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie:</p>
<p>I could not agree more.  Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie McElwee</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie McElwee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/04/01/enviromental-protection-enforcement-part-2/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Tom: I should note that most lawyers in China who currently bring actions on behalf of plaintiffs injured by environmental pollution are what would be characterized as &quot;public interest&quot; lawyers in the US.  These lawyers in the US would now be more focused on &quot;citizens&#039; suits,&quot; than on personal injury suits (because the well-developed plaintiff&#039;s bar provides a market option).  Citizen suits (where private citizens are authorized to sue to enforce the law on the books in the absence of effective enforcement by the primary enforcement authorities) have not been authorized in any of China&#039;s environmental laws, thus, the barriers to these suits are more than structural and cultural.  I would add &quot;citizen suits&quot; as an arrow which the enforcement quiver needs in China.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom: I should note that most lawyers in China who currently bring actions on behalf of plaintiffs injured by environmental pollution are what would be characterized as &#8220;public interest&#8221; lawyers in the US.  These lawyers in the US would now be more focused on &#8220;citizens&#8217; suits,&#8221; than on personal injury suits (because the well-developed plaintiff&#8217;s bar provides a market option).  Citizen suits (where private citizens are authorized to sue to enforce the law on the books in the absence of effective enforcement by the primary enforcement authorities) have not been authorized in any of China&#8217;s environmental laws, thus, the barriers to these suits are more than structural and cultural.  I would add &#8220;citizen suits&#8221; as an arrow which the enforcement quiver needs in China.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
