Comments on: china’s new labor contract law… for american readers http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/11/chinas-new-labor-contract-law-for-american-readers/ A China law blog covering issues in Chinese law, business, and society Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: T Chow http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/11/chinas-new-labor-contract-law-for-american-readers/#comment-651 T Chow Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:00:50 +0000 http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/11/chinas-new-labor-contract-law-for-american-readers/#comment-651 I appreciate the clarification. However, I <strong>did</strong> give credit to China L&P magazine for the article. H/t refers to the fact that Dan Harris found and posted it before I did, and I am acknowledging that. I also refer to Dan's other posts b/c that is part of his current post--a bunch of his own prior posts on topic. No one has claimed any psuedo-authorship and I think you have inferred something that doesn't exist from the language in my post. I appreciate the clarification. However, I did give credit to China L&P magazine for the article. H/t refers to the fact that Dan Harris found and posted it before I did, and I am acknowledging that. I also refer to Dan’s other posts b/c that is part of his current post–a bunch of his own prior posts on topic.

No one has claimed any psuedo-authorship and I think you have inferred something that doesn’t exist from the language in my post.

]]> By: Jeff Gregan http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/11/chinas-new-labor-contract-law-for-american-readers/#comment-650 Jeff Gregan Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:32:33 +0000 http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/11/chinas-new-labor-contract-law-for-american-readers/#comment-650 Tom, just to get your credits right please. The translation you mentioned was nothing to do with either Dan Harris or China Law Blog, and it is disingenous of both you and them to imply otherwise. It was actually published by the legal editorial team at China Law & Practice, part of Asia Law & Practice, owned by Euromoney Publications. If you're going to give credits, please ensure you credit the right people and not those who merely put up links on their blogs to other peoples work. This practice on China law blogs of claiming pseudo credit for China legal material that was sourced from other people's intellect and resources is becoming rather irritating. Tom, just to get your credits right please. The translation you mentioned was nothing to do with either Dan Harris or China Law Blog, and it is disingenous of both you and them to imply otherwise. It was actually published by the legal editorial team at China Law & Practice, part of Asia Law & Practice, owned by Euromoney Publications. If you’re going to give credits, please ensure you credit the right people and not those who merely put up links on their blogs to other peoples work. This practice on China law blogs of claiming pseudo credit for China legal material that was sourced from other people’s intellect and resources is becoming rather irritating.

]]>