<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: is &#8220;no more chinese knock-offs&#8221; an empty threat?</title>
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/23/is-no-more-chinese-knock-offs-an-empty-threat/</link>
	<description>A China law blog covering issues in Chinese law, business, and society</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Posts of the Week: 6/23 - 6/29 &#124; China Stocks Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/23/is-no-more-chinese-knock-offs-an-empty-threat/#comment-690</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts of the Week: 6/23 - 6/29 &#124; China Stocks Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/06/23/is-no-more-chinese-knock-offs-an-empty-threat/#comment-690</guid>
		<description>[...] is “no more chinese knock-offs” an empty threat? at China Esquire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is “no more chinese knock-offs” an empty threat? at China Esquire [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
