<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: if blocking coke isn&#8217;t about nationalism, what is it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/</link>
	<description>China law blog covering Chinese law, business, and non-profits by Thomas Chow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: T Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>T Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 05:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/16/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>Will:

I don&#039;t disagree that its an effective strategy.  I think it is, though I think much of it is motivated by things other than a duty to shareholders.  (Of course, there is an assumption that this consortium&#039;s action is really beneficial for the shareholders, which it may or may not be...  I don&#039;t know the books and values of the different assets and IP involved)  

In this day in age, few directors/officers ever really care about the shareholders.  (not much in America, probably less in China)  It&#039;s about the bottom line in most cases, as it is here.

So I&#039;d say that this consortium is probably motivated by a mixture of nationalism + opportunism.  But of course, it&#039;s only made possible by nationalism.  I&#039;m just looking to call it what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will:</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t disagree that its an effective strategy.  I think it is, though I think much of it is motivated by things other than a duty to shareholders.  (Of course, there is an assumption that this consortium&#8217;s action is really beneficial for the shareholders, which it may or may not be&#8230;  I don&#8217;t know the books and values of the different assets and IP involved)  </p>
<p>In this day in age, few directors/officers ever really care about the shareholders.  (not much in America, probably less in China)  It&#8217;s about the bottom line in most cases, as it is here.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;d say that this consortium is probably motivated by a mixture of nationalism + opportunism.  But of course, it&#8217;s only made possible by nationalism.  I&#8217;m just looking to call it what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/09/16/if-blocking-coke-isnt-about-nationalism-what-is-it/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>If Coke was gonna move into my market in a big way, and I had the opportunity to invoke protections under protectionist legislation to keep them out, would I owe a duty to my shareholders to do just that? If appeals to nationalism could keep a huge competitor out of one&#039;s market, then appealing to nationalism regardless of one&#039;s actual nationalistic tendencies could prove pretty effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Coke was gonna move into my market in a big way, and I had the opportunity to invoke protections under protectionist legislation to keep them out, would I owe a duty to my shareholders to do just that? If appeals to nationalism could keep a huge competitor out of one&#8217;s market, then appealing to nationalism regardless of one&#8217;s actual nationalistic tendencies could prove pretty effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
