<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: looks like the sanlu lawsuits are still going nowhere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/</link>
	<description>China law blog covering Chinese law, business, and non-profits by Thomas Chow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: T Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>T Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/17/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>I beg to differ.  It&#039;s not just the U.S. law system that uses the policies I discuss.  And if I remember correctly, Chinese law (as well as Taiwanese law) draws a lot upon U.S. law as a source of inspiration.  (and other sources too such as Germany and Japan)  I think even the Chinese government understands that its legal system needs to get better.  I view my commentary as providing what I think is useful policy correction/addition.  

How do I think it works?  Because I see Chinese people and clients litigate in U.S. courts.  Not often--it often takes quite a bit of persuasion (or frustration) to overcome their inertia and dislike of the legal system.  But frankly, once they actually embrace the legal system, it does them a lot of good.

I think you&#039;re too complacent in your &quot;knowledge&quot; of the Chinese legal system/culture, and don&#039;t care for any sort of improvement.   I normally moderate our your comments, but just so I can say this, I left it: why don&#039;t you provide real solutions for once?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ.  It&#8217;s not just the U.S. law system that uses the policies I discuss.  And if I remember correctly, Chinese law (as well as Taiwanese law) draws a lot upon U.S. law as a source of inspiration.  (and other sources too such as Germany and Japan)  I think even the Chinese government understands that its legal system needs to get better.  I view my commentary as providing what I think is useful policy correction/addition.  </p>
<p>How do I think it works?  Because I see Chinese people and clients litigate in U.S. courts.  Not often&#8211;it often takes quite a bit of persuasion (or frustration) to overcome their inertia and dislike of the legal system.  But frankly, once they actually embrace the legal system, it does them a lot of good.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re too complacent in your &#8220;knowledge&#8221; of the Chinese legal system/culture, and don&#8217;t care for any sort of improvement.   I normally moderate our your comments, but just so I can say this, I left it: why don&#8217;t you provide real solutions for once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chen Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Chen Wang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2008/10/17/looks-like-the-sanlu-lawsuits-are-still-going-nowhere/#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t understand China. You&#039;re just putting what you know about US law onto the Chinese system and it doesn&#039;t work. Typical square peg, round hole scenario. As it stands, the Government is arranging compensation directly, it is considered not necessary to go through the legal system to obtain it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t understand China. You&#8217;re just putting what you know about US law onto the Chinese system and it doesn&#8217;t work. Typical square peg, round hole scenario. As it stands, the Government is arranging compensation directly, it is considered not necessary to go through the legal system to obtain it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
