<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weil gotshal even more active in hong kong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2009/10/weil-gotshal-even-more-active-in-hong-kong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2009/10/weil-gotshal-even-more-active-in-hong-kong/</link>
	<description>China law blog covering Chinese law, business, and non-profits by Thomas Chow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 02:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Chow</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2009/10/weil-gotshal-even-more-active-in-hong-kong/comment-page-1/#comment-11785</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Chow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/?p=427#comment-11785</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting.  What you are saying confirms what I&#039;ve been hearing, so I appreciate the input!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting.  What you are saying confirms what I&#8217;ve been hearing, so I appreciate the input!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK-PRCLEGAL JOB EXPERT</title>
		<link>http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/2009/10/weil-gotshal-even-more-active-in-hong-kong/comment-page-1/#comment-11763</link>
		<dc:creator>HK-PRCLEGAL JOB EXPERT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinalawandbusiness.com/?p=427#comment-11763</guid>
		<description>Things are not getting worse but they are also not much better for the private practice law firm side in China.  HK is showing brighter activity but with cautious optimism.  It&#039;s the same story as in the US.  Clients are much more sensitive to billing rates and often, slower to pay the bill with many asking for significant discounts.  Associates may be busier, but Partners are having a tougher time getting the money.  

The market is quite fragmented with some firms looking to hire with specific criteria and higher scrutiny for quality.  There are still many US firms still cutting salary/work hours and telling associates that their firms are facing a challenging time.  The legal market is too crowded and only select firms have a pipeline of business to survive.  Many law firms simply do not have enough work to keep everyone busy and this has gone on for a year with associates sitting at their desk drafting marketing materials, writing legal commentary, chatting on MSN or simply watching the stock market.

The PRC legal market is simply too crowded for International firms.  We are seeing PRC firms with lower billing rates upgrading their quality significantly over the past 2 years by absorbing associates from international firms.  Why would a client pay for a transaction done by the same people?

However, just like any business, there are those who are looking to exit and those trying to enter because China is still the growth story at present with a shining outlook for the next two decades.

Every firm is looking to bolster their platform with Partners who command a portable book of business.

BTW, Simmons has also sent back partners in Shanghai also but that was months ago.  Maybe they are planning to thin their resources out in Asia since quite a few teams have defected from them over the years rendering them a training ground for future new office openings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things are not getting worse but they are also not much better for the private practice law firm side in China.  HK is showing brighter activity but with cautious optimism.  It&#8217;s the same story as in the US.  Clients are much more sensitive to billing rates and often, slower to pay the bill with many asking for significant discounts.  Associates may be busier, but Partners are having a tougher time getting the money.  </p>
<p>The market is quite fragmented with some firms looking to hire with specific criteria and higher scrutiny for quality.  There are still many US firms still cutting salary/work hours and telling associates that their firms are facing a challenging time.  The legal market is too crowded and only select firms have a pipeline of business to survive.  Many law firms simply do not have enough work to keep everyone busy and this has gone on for a year with associates sitting at their desk drafting marketing materials, writing legal commentary, chatting on MSN or simply watching the stock market.</p>
<p>The PRC legal market is simply too crowded for International firms.  We are seeing PRC firms with lower billing rates upgrading their quality significantly over the past 2 years by absorbing associates from international firms.  Why would a client pay for a transaction done by the same people?</p>
<p>However, just like any business, there are those who are looking to exit and those trying to enter because China is still the growth story at present with a shining outlook for the next two decades.</p>
<p>Every firm is looking to bolster their platform with Partners who command a portable book of business.</p>
<p>BTW, Simmons has also sent back partners in Shanghai also but that was months ago.  Maybe they are planning to thin their resources out in Asia since quite a few teams have defected from them over the years rendering them a training ground for future new office openings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
