Archive for the 'Society' Category

Dec 30 2009

examining china’s expert defense of the uk execution

Looks like Xinhua published its defense of the execution of a British mentally ill man in an article entitled “Experts defend China’s execution of British drug smuggler”. I’m actually glad they did–it makes it a lot easier to dissect. And for the poor professors (Mingliang Wang and Jinzhan Xue), I’m sorry, you lose and that’s just how the game is played.

Again, caveat: I normally don’t just go into attack mode like this anymore. (I don’t litigate on a regular basis anymore and I try to turn off this gear that’s internal to my brain) But if you want to read on, feel free.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

One response so far

Dec 29 2009

execution of mentally ill man is two steps back for china

CNN just published an article, “China executes British citizen for drug smuggling”. I normally don’t try to weigh in and blatantly criticize the Chinese justice system despite certain corrupt documented incidents and obvious issues because it’s been improving over the years, and I have been hopeful that the rule of law has a chance to survive there. I am, however, severely disturbed about the recent execution of the mentally ill British man when there were obvious due process issues, despite The Global Times insisting that “the trial process was extremely careful”.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

No responses yet

Dec 16 2009

standard defense lawyer tactics

Published by Thomas Chow under China, Law, Litigation, Society

Apparently, there is a crackdown on corrupt officials and organized crime in Chongqing. Others caught up in the sting? Defense lawyers. It’s like the tuna nets that end up picking up a few dolphins along the way. The only problem is this: the defense lawyer here is just doing his job. At least, he’s doing his job, in my opinion, as any normal defense advocate would do here.

The details after the jump.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

6 responses so far

Nov 28 2009

lack of brand innovation in china?

Published by Thomas Chow under Business, China, IP, Products, Society

Was reading China Law Blog’s treatment of Chinese branding and trademarks here where Dan Harris takes issue with a Newsweek article, which states in part:

The simplest explanation for China’s failure to build global brands is cutthroat domestic competition. In most product categories, hundreds or thousands of firms compete for domestic market share, leaving profit margins razor thin. . . . And because foreign brands have taken much of the market’s high end, most companies are forced to compete on cost, leaving little room for investment in R&D or marketing. . . . Finally, the recent string of product recalls—including poisonous pet food and faulty tires—has left consumers wary of made-in-China goods.

Of course, I would take issue with this article as Dan does. His thoughts, and mine, after the jump.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

One response so far

Oct 14 2009

the need for a moral compass

Published by Thomas Chow under China, Society

I haven’t done too many posts responsive to other bloggers recently, but I really felt the need to emphasize something I read at Silicon Hutong today.  David published a post today entitled, “ Whose Moral Relativism?“  I found it definitely worth the read because there’s a lot of food for thought…  both for China, and just in general as well.  Yes, this post might sound sort of preachy and hit on moral values, but I think its useful to think about such issues because so much of business is predicated on this.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

2 responses so far

Aug 24 2009

social entrepreneurism in china: the qifang story

Published by Thomas Chow under China, Law, Non-profit, Society

Last month, I was invited to a lunch seminar (invitation only) hosted by Give2Asia where they discussed the challenges facing Chinese education, and more specifically, the problem of funding Chinese higher education.  Scott Sugiara with Give2Asia gave us some of the statistics: since 2001, their organization has given over $100 million to Asia, and about 35% of that has been in the forms of grants/scholarships to individuals.  (focused mostly on Jiaotong Daxue and other Shanghai university students)  One thing he also noted was that education is not cheaper at the top universities because there are often scholarships for those students.  Ironically, its the students who go to regional and vocational schools who have a harder time affording their higher education.

One solution, after the jump.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

2 responses so far

Aug 10 2009

human rights attorneys in china compilation

Published by Thomas Chow under Career advice, China, Law, Society

I was speaking to a friend a few months back, and he wants to shift into human rights law in China. I looked at him with a certain tinge of sadness in my eyes, and could only ask him one question, “You do know what you’re getting into right? It’s a hard life. It’s hard… and you may be asking for persecution, trouble, and a lot of pain and suffering from your own government.” There was nothing else I could say. And when he responded in the affirmative resolutely, I could only stare a little and say, “Okay.” And it’s ironic that since then, I feel like I’ve only seen a slew of articles talking about the troubles of human rights attorneys.

Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

One response so far

May 18 2009

NERA seminar part 2: nationalism’s intersection with antitrust

Published by Thomas Chow under Business, China, Law, Society

And so this brings me to part 2 of my NERA notes—the part presented by Fei Deng, who talked about the role of nationalism in this deal.  Unfortunately, she decided to start with imperialistic times and talked about things like the Summer Palace, and Chinese humiliation.  Not any of my favorite of topics.

But then she went back to Coke-Huiyuan.  More after the jump.
Continue Reading »

  • Share/Bookmark

One response so far

Dec 21 2008

nytimes not appearing china… what did you expect?

Published by Thomas Chow under China, Society

A long overdue weekend review.  So it seems like the great firewall is working again, and this time, its the New York Times that has some sort of technical glitches that won’t allow it to show up in China again.  From CNET yesterday:

Chinese authorities have begun blocking access from mainland China to the Web site of The New York Times even while lifting some of the restrictions they had recently imposed on the Web sites of other media outlets.

When computer users in cities like Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou tried to connect on Friday morning local time to NYTimes.com, they received a message that the site was not available; some users were cut off on Thursday as early as 8 p.m. The blocking was still in effect on Saturday morning.

Chinese officials had few explanations for the restriction on the Times site. “Concerning your particular question, we’re not really familiar with the details,” said a spokesman for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing, who declined to give his name. “Web site maintenance is not within the job purview of the Foreign Ministry.”

Tang Rui, an official with the government’s International Press Center in Beijing, said he also had no specific information. “It might be a technical problem,” he said, declining to elaborate.

In the months leading up to the Olympics in Beijing, during the Games and immediately after, the Chinese government temporarily unblocked access to some Web sites and eased curbs on the ability of foreign correspondents to travel within China. It has not tightened the travel restrictions since then.

So China is cracking down on “free” internet usage again.  To be honest, I am actually surprised it lasted this long…  I thought it would be may be 2 months or so, and then that’s it, the clamp comes down.  Well, it went a little longer than I expected, so I am willing to count this as a good thing overall.

I’m pretty darn certain its not a technical glitch.  The NY Times site seems to work for me just fine.  (and probably all over the world too except for one rather significant “outage”)  But honestly, what did you expect?  I don’t think anyone figured that the Olympics would mean that China would allow free and unfettered piping in of western propaganda and media…  and it was only a matter of time before it happened again.  So pardon me if I don’t run around and act like its a big deal…  and yawn instead.  My thought: just get used to it because it was bound to happen.

  • Share/Bookmark

No responses yet

Oct 21 2008

conference: global economics and immigration policy, 10/24

Published by Thomas Chow under Law, Society

Just got this email on the late side, so I apologize for the lack of notice.  My alma mater, UC Hastings, is sponsoring a conference entitled “ Cities and Counties in the Global Economy: Local Immigration and Economic Policies under a Microscope“.  Time and location:

October 24, 2008
8:30 am to 4:00 pm, Reception to Follow

UC Hastings College of the Law
198 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102

And here is some more information on the topics to be covered:

Cities and counties respond to the global economy in creative and sometimes controversial ways.  On the economic side, cities flex their economic muscle through community development agreements, project labor agreements, living wage ordinances and the like. On the immigration side, day laborer ordinances, sanctuary and non-cooperation policies, and state and federal preemption dominate council rooms and courtrooms.

Do these policies work?  What legal issues do they raise?  What challenges do they pose for the basic legal, political and economic framework of local government?

Should be intriguing, though I don’t think I can make it on such sort notice personally.  The more detailed brochure can be found here, and registration link is here.

  • Share/Bookmark

No responses yet

Sep 26 2008

annual meeting of the american society of comparative law

I should have posted this one earlier, like some other interesting conferences/symposiums that are happening around here.  Anyways, the ACSL is having their annual meeting from 10/2/08 – 10/4/08 at my alma mater, UC Hastings College of the Law.  (198 McAllister St., San Francisco, CA 94102 USA)  The title of this year’s meeting is “The West and the Rest in Comparative Law”.

This conference aims at unveiling the “master narrative” of the Western Legal Tradition as reflected in the comparative study of law. In particular, we will explore how we perceive ourselves in relation to “the other”, i.e. what once was known as the radically different legal cultures. Very often our description of the other is deeply revealing of our own “self portraits”, something that we need to better understand. To be sure, in order to properly compare, we should get rid of as many stereotypes as possible both about our own Western identity and about that of the rest. Only by doing so may we avoid comparing actual legal entities with imaginary ones.

The program is here.  It looks interesting enough from a theoretical perspective, so those who are into comparative law might want to attend this one.

More information can be found here.  And registration is here.

  • Share/Bookmark

No responses yet

Jul 28 2008

customer service or lack thereof…

Published by Thomas Chow under China, Society

I had spent about 3 weeks in China, traveling from Beijing to Shanghai, with a number of stops in between. After that, my wife and I headed to Hong Kong and Macau.

After spending this much time in China, Hong Kong reminded me much of the west when it came to one important aspect: customer service. ( Silicon Hutong wrote up something about service in Hong Kong a few months back) Imagine the difference where a waiter actually comes to serve you, as opposed to a restaurant or cafe where you need to call the waiter for anything. (Practice calling “fuyuan” in a loud voice) After finding service even at higher end Beijing and Shanghai establishments to be disappointing, Hong Kong was a breath of fresh air.

What surprised me was the level of customer service in Macau (a.k.a. Vegas in China). I expected the same. I was wrong. I spent some time at the Grand Lisboa, a fairly new hotel and casino run by SJM. I was fairly impressed by the multi-level casino there, as well as the fact that they had a separate Texas Hold ‘Em room. Other casinos only have mostly Bacarrat. (Caveat: I do not gamble at all) It’s very Vegas-like, and they even have Stanley Ho’s large 218 carat diamond on display there. Overall, I thought the place was very nice inside. (The outside reminds me of the Rio in Vegas and leaves something to be desired–the Sands and the Wynn were much more understated and classy)

We were eating a meal at the Noodle House at the Grand Lisboa. And apparently the restaurant has a policy: do not allow customers to keep bottled water on the tables. Even the water bottles that are provided by the Grand Lisboa hotel. Rationale? It doesn’t look nice and they want to keep an upscale image. (I also note that the restaurant isn’t really all that upscale and that it is a complete delusion) So what happened? The staff offered us hot water… or you pay for tea. Everyone opted for hot water except me. I preferred colder water. I was kindly poured a cup of hot water and asked to remove my bottle. Which I refused to do because I would have nothing to drink then.

As the meal came closer to an end and the water in my bottle was slowly diminishing, one of the staff had the bright idea that they could just take the bottle and throw it away. Right in front of me. Even after I glared at her a little for taking it. No apology. Nothing. Just the standard line, “you aren’t allowed to use a water bottle”.

I decided to do the American thing instead of the Chinese thing in response: I asked for the manager instead of allowing them to save face. And I told him that this was unacceptable customer service. He told me that everyone who didn’t want hot water could have opted for cold water. Funny, this wasn’t offered to me. And I let him know that. He said that it was my responsibility to request it. It wasn’t. That was something that should have been offered instead of bottle thievery. Lesson #1: do not blame your customers for poor customer service.

Once I pointed that out, he apologized and blamed the staff. It’s summer and the staff there are a lot of temporary workers–college students looking to earn money. And he attempted to distance himself from their error. I noted that it didn’t matter–this is supposed to be a first rate casino in Macau and that they were responsible for training all employees properly. Lesson #2: do not blame your staff for poor customer service, particularly if you didn’t train them properly.

The manager must’ve known that was a lame excuse. So he laid down what was the bottom line for him: the boss said no water bottles allowed. That’s why it was taken from me. And because the boss said no water bottles allowed, that’s why none were allowed. It didn’t matter that the staff didn’t offer any alternative. (Bill Dodson has done some posts on the lack of Chinese innovation, as well as other blogs–many note that there is a Chinese stubborn adherence to the orders of a superior without any desire to question or improve) He might as well have said, “this is the Chinese way.”

And so I told him, “you tell your supervisor that you either need to train people to offer cold water instead of taking water bottles away or tell him that they need to learn customer service–which is that the customer is always right.” I hope this manager told his boss my comments. I doubt he did.

Overall, I was pretty shocked at the lack of customer service in Macau. I expected this in China, but not in Macau. Sure, it was better than the mainland.  But that’s not saying much frankly.  If Macau wants to attract more foreigners, the casinos better learn to shape up.

Anyways, enough ranting…

  • Share/Bookmark

2 responses so far

Next »

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline